Getting it Right For Every Child

GIRFEC (Getting it right for every child) is Scotland's pan-social policy foundation principles for every government agency dealing with children.

The ten main principles are:

  1. A focus on improving outcomes for children, young people and their families based on a shared understanding of wellbeing
  2. A common approach to the proportionate sharing of information where appropriate
  3. An integral role for children, young people and families in assessment, planning and intervention
  4. A co-ordinated and unified approach to identifying concerns, assessing needs, and agreeing actions and outcomes, based on the wellbeing Indicators
  5. Streamlined planning, assessment and decision-making processes that lead to the right help at the right time
  6. Consistent high standards of co-operation, joint working and communication where more than one agency needs to be involved, locally and across Scotland
  7. A Named Person for every child and young person, and a Lead Professional (where necessary) to co-ordinate and monitor multi-agency activity
  8. Maximising the skilled workforce within universal services to address needs and risks as early as possible
  9. A confident and competent workforce across all services for children, young people and their families
  10. The capacity to share demographic, assessment, and planning information - including electronically - within and across agency boundaries

This is important for penal reform because we must ensure that young people who are themselves within the criminal justice system are protected by these principles. These principles can also be used as the measure with which to protect those children who are so often affected by parental imprisonment, and yet often remain largely forgotten (for more on this see Families Outside).

Getting it Right For Every Child


Youth Justice Under the Radar

An excellent report from Howard League England and Wales has revealed how young people are placed under an ‘intensive supervision and surveillance’ (ISS) which is given as an 'additional punishment'. This sanction is not given by a judge but it includes tagging, a curfew and 25 hours specified activity. If a young person does not comply, they can be returned to jail. Howard League England and Wales have described this as an injustice,and an expensive one at that.

Howard League for Penal Reform (England & Wales): They couldn't do it to a grown up - tagging without due process

Extended Family Visits

It has emerged that the women’s prison Drake Hall in Staffordshire is being refurbished and will include a facility for extended family visits. That is to say that there will be a facility for prisoners’ families to stay overnight. Obviously having this kind of facility enables much more meaningful contact between prisoners and their family members, particularly their young children. These sorts of facilities are also found in other jurisdictions, such as Norway and Canada and we would certainly regard this provision as best practice for a new women’s prison.

At last week's Cross Party Group on Families Affected By Imprisonment Chief Executive of SPS, Colin McConnell articulated that such a facility was “still a possibility”. We would hope that there is still the chance that it will be built into the design and available for prisoners’ families from the first day of operation. 

This is of particualr necessity in Scotland, a large country in which families have large distances to travel to reach prisons for visits. At the same parilamentary meeting members voiced concerns about the difficulties facing prisoners’ families based in rural areas who wished to visit prisoners held in establishments in the central belt.

We know that those family bonds and relationships are a central part of the desistance process. As SPS and Scottish Government build a prison near the central belt they must make a commitment to develop facilities which support not just prisoners, but their families as well, making visits as easy as possible for everyone involved. 

Read more here:

Is prison the only future for women's penal policy?

It is not possible to contemplate a sustained reduction in Scotland’s female prison  population without considering the balance between the provision of custodial  sentences and the provision of community disposals. These are two halves of the  same coin. Two years on from the publication of the report of the Commission on  Women Offenders, we are concerned that the balance is still significantly tilted in  favour of custody rather than community-based approaches to addressing women’s offending behaviour. Nor is it possible to envisage reductions in the female prison  population without focussing on the root causes of women’s offending – poverty, substance and alcohol misuse, mental health problems, histories of domestic and  sexual abuse. These issues must be tackled if we are to prevent women from entering the criminal justice system in the first place.

The Cabinet Secretary for Justice recently reflected that the plight of women caught up in our criminal justice system was one of “the most pressing social issues of recent times”. The Committee will be familiar with the characteristics and needs of women offenders, and the rise of Scotland‟s female prison population, which was the spur for the establishment of the Commission.

The female prison population has risen by 120% since 2000, despite conviction rates remaining stable over the same period. Whilst there has been a small decrease in the number of women in custody over the last year, it remains to be seen whether this reduction will persist. According to Scottish Prison Service figures, on 6 June 2014, there were 332 convicted female prisoners and 75 untried female offenders in custody.

Whilst the Scottish Government nominally accepted the majority of the Commission‟s 37 recommendations, we are concerned that some of the recommendations are not being implemented as the report‟s authors intended.

A replacement for Cornton Vale
We were pleased to note the Commission‟s recommendation to close HMP Cornton Vale and welcomed the proposal that it should be replaced with “a smaller specialist prison for those women offenders serving a statutory defined long-term sentence and those who present a significant risk to the public” (Report of the Commission on Women Offenders, April 2012, p.10)

We are therefore disappointed that the Scottish Government intends to construct a new women‟s prison with a maximum capacity of 350 that will handle convicted and 
remand adult and young offenders of varying legal and security categories and of varying sentence length, from short term sentences to life prisoners. This is a clear departure from the recommendation made by the Commission. In addition to HMP Inverclyde, women will continue to be held in HMP Edinburgh and HMP Grampian. There are 50 places for female prisoners in HMP Grampian and HMP Edinburgh currently holds around 100 women. Therefore the projected capacity of the female prison estate once HMP Inverclyde is operational in 2017 will be around 500. HMP Inverclyde is expected to have a lifespan of at least 60 years and the contract for its construction will go out to tender in October 2014.

Building to projections
The failure to reduce capacity in the female prison estate is often justified on the grounds that it is necessary to adhere to prison population projections. However, there is evidence to suggest that creating capacity in the form of new prison places may itself actually increase the likelihood of a rise in the prison population. Cautioning against over-reliance on historical patterns in the prison population, criminologist Dr Sarah Armstrong wrote recently that “prison forecasts are at risk of triggering a self-fulfilling prophecy encouraging capital expansion”. Writing about the prison boom in the USA, Spellman (2009) concludes that “nothing was inevitable about the prison build up in the United States” and that a “dramatic improvement in the infrastructure for delivery of alternative sanctions” is what is likely to be required to reduce prison populations.

The balance between custody and community disposals
Therefore, if we are to reduce the female prison population in Scotland, as well as a reduction in prison places, there must also be sufficient investment in community disposals for women. This ‘twin-track’ approach is essential if we are to bring a halt to the upward spiral of female imprisonment in Scotland. However, we are not yet convinced that the commitment exists for a sufficient shift in resources to enable this to happen. 

The Scottish Government has allocated £3m over the two-year period 2013-2015 to support women offenders in the community. This is welcome, however, it pales in comparison with the annual cost of imprisoning women. The Scottish Prison Service estimated in 2011/12 that the average annual cost of imprisonment per prisoner was £32,371. Based on an average daily female prisoner population of 400, the annual cost of imprisonment for women is in the region of £13m (although it is likely to be higher than this, given the additional needs of female prisoners). We also note that the capital expenditure for HMP Inverclyde is expected to be around £75m.

Privately, a number of organisations working with women offenders have conceded that the resources allocated to community-based interventions are a „drop in the 
ocean‟. We also note their concerns about the short-term nature of funding arrangements, which threaten the sustainability of those services, and the ability to demonstrate their effectiveness.

We know that the needs of women offenders are better addressed in the community and the Commission‟s report highlighted a number of existing services supporting women in the community. The Cabinet Secretary for Justice indicated in his October 2013 report to Parliament that funds would be made available for the expansion of the Willow project in Edinburgh. However, whilst the Scottish Government intends to maintain its £1.7m annual funding of the 218 Service in Glasgow, we understand that no additional funds have been made available to the Service since the publication ofthe Commission‟s report.

The Commission‟s report highlighted the importance of leadership in driving forward this agenda. We are disappointed that the recommendation to establish a national Community Justice and Prison Delivery Board has not been implemented, presumably due to the fact that the Scottish Government is currently considering reform of community justice in Scotland more generally. The existence of such a body would provide a critical function, increasing accountability and oversight, andenabling a rebalancing of responses to women‟s offending away from custodial sentences to community-based solutions.

We are also concerned that the Scottish Government appears to be stepping back from responsibility for oversight of the response to the Commission‟s report. When Howard League Scotland asked the Cabinet Secretary for Justice whether the proposals for HMP Inverclyde were in keeping with the Commission‟s overall aspirations, he replied saying that decisions relating to the size and design of HMP Inverclyde were operational matters for the Scottish Prison Service. 

It is unfair to expect the Scottish Prison Service – whose business it is to build and operate prisons – to take an overview of the whole package required to reduce female imprisonment in Scotland, when so much of the task of meeting that challenge is beyond their control. 

The Commission‟s report acknowledged the role that sentencing has played in the growth of the female prison population in Scotland, making five recommendations in this area and further three recommendations on „Alternatives to remand‟. It noted research carried out by the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research which found “general longer-term increases in the use of custody compared to other disposals and some degree of upward drift in sentence length” (p.19). It would seem that sentencing practice remains unchanged and that progress in this area has been limited. Clearly this is cause for concern given the role that sentencing has played in contributing to the growth of Scotland‟s female prison population.

Tackling the root causes of women’s offending behaviour
Our aspiration should be to prevent women coming into contact with the criminal justice in the first instance. Therefore we must address the social disadvantage that shapes some women‟s lives. Real success in preventing offending behaviour, as well as reducing offending, lies beyond the realms of penal policy. 

Very few women need to be in prison for reasons of public protection and the pains of imprisonment are more acute for women than men, as evidenced by the high rates of self-harm and mental illness seen in the female prison population. The damaging, often long lasting, effects on children of maternal imprisonment are also well documented. The £60m allocated to the construction of HMP Inverclyde would be put to better use resourcing community justice centres, as well as the “smaller specialist prison” envisaged by the Commission on Women Offenders. The radicalism at the heart of the Commission‟s report is in danger of being lost, as we once again fall back on imprisonment as the primary response to women‟s offending.

Howard League Scotland
18 June 

Support reform in women's penal policy by becoming a member of Howard League Scotland:

Baroness Corston: Inverclyde prison 'will fail'

HLS remain opposed to the Scottish Government's commitment to replace Cornton Vale with an even larger women's prison. This stands in direct contradiction to the plan laid out by The Angiolini Report, which illustrated the need for community based one stop shops. These centers would allow women to remain in their community and support them in dealing with their complex needs, such as addiction, homelessness, mental health problems and overcome histories of abuse - all of which we know to influence criminal behaviour.

The government's plan have received another damning indictment, this time from Baroness Jean Corston. In 2007 Corston carried out an extensive review of women's imprisonment in the UK which was widely welcomed and seen as one of the most significant policy reviews on this issue. The value of her insight and strength of her authority on what is best for women's penal policy cannot be overstated or underestimated, therefore. Spekaing to Hollyrood Magazine reviewed the plans for Inverclyde, her verdict being: 'It will fail'. The interview is a powerful statement, arguing that the cost of incarcerating women is too great a price to pay when there exist more effective alternatives, such as the 218 Project, the Willow Centre and Tomorrow's Women.

Read more:
HLS position on Inverclyde:
Hollyrood Magazine:
The Corston Report: